Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 167: 108353, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-688787

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We assessed how altered diagnostic processes and criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) recommended by the United Kingdom (UK), Canada and Australia for use during the COVID-19 pandemic would affect both GDM frequency and related adverse outcomes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 5974 HAPO study women with singleton pregnancies who underwent 75 g OGTTs and HbA1c assays between 24 and 32 weeks' gestation and who received no treatment for GDM. RESULTS: All post COVID-19 modified pathways reduced GDM frequency - UK (81%), Canada (82%) and Australia (25%). Canadian women whose GDM would remain undetected post COVID-19 (missed GDMs) displayed similar rates of pregnancy complications to those with post COVID-19 GDM. Using UK modifications, the missed GDM group were at slightly lower risk whilst the women missed using the Australian modifications were at substantially lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: The modifications in GDM diagnosis proposed for the UK, Canada and Australia result in differing reductions of GDM frequency. Each has both potential benefits in terms of reduction in potential exposure to COVID-19 and costs in terms of missed opportunities to influence pregnancy and postpartum outcomes. These factors should be considered when deciding which protocol is most appropriate for a particular context.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Diabetes, Gestational/diagnosis , Glucose Tolerance Test/methods , Missed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Adult , Australia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Canada , Diabetes, Gestational/metabolism , Fasting , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom
4.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi ; 43(5): 427-430, 2020 May 12.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-591192

ABSTRACT

Objective: To raise awareness about 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) and reduce missed diagnosis rate and misdiagnosis rate by comparing the clinical characteristics between RNA positive and negative patients clinically diagnosed with NCP. Methods: From January 2020 to February 2020, 54 patients who were newly diagnosed with NCP in Wuhan Fourth Hospital were included in this study. RT-PCR method was used to measure the level of 2019-nCov RNA in pharyngeal swab samples of these patients. The patients were divided into RNA positive and negative group, and the differences of clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics were compared. Results: There were 31 RNA of 2019-nCov positive cases, and 23 negative cases. Common clinical symptoms of two groups were fever (80.64% vs. 86.96%) , chills (61.29% vs. 52.17%) , cough (80.64% vs. 95.65%) , fatigue (61.30% vs. 56.52%) , chest distress (77.42% vs.73.91%) . Some other symptoms were headache, myalgia, dyspnea, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. The laboratory and radiological characteristics of two groups mainly were lymphopenia, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, increased C-reactive protein, increased lactate dehydrogenase, decreased oxygenation index, normal white blood cell count and bilateral chest CT involvement. There was no statistically significant difference in other clinical characteristics except for dyspnea between two groups. Conclusions: RNA positive and negative NCP patients shared similar clinical symptoms, while RNA positive NCP patients tended to have dyspnea. Therefore, we should improve the understanding of NCP to prevent missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis; In addition, more rapid and accurate NCP diagnostic approaches should be further developed.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , RNA, Viral , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Missed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/pathology , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Science ; 368(6490): 489-493, 2020 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-8682

ABSTRACT

Estimation of the prevalence and contagiousness of undocumented novel coronavirus [severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)] infections is critical for understanding the overall prevalence and pandemic potential of this disease. Here, we use observations of reported infection within China, in conjunction with mobility data, a networked dynamic metapopulation model, and Bayesian inference, to infer critical epidemiological characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2, including the fraction of undocumented infections and their contagiousness. We estimate that 86% of all infections were undocumented [95% credible interval (CI): 82-90%] before the 23 January 2020 travel restrictions. The transmission rate of undocumented infections per person was 55% the transmission rate of documented infections (95% CI: 46-62%), yet, because of their greater numbers, undocumented infections were the source of 79% of the documented cases. These findings explain the rapid geographic spread of SARS-CoV-2 and indicate that containment of this virus will be particularly challenging.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Missed Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Models, Theoretical , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Bayes Theorem , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Epidemiological Monitoring , Humans , Pandemics , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Travel
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL